
The best thing I ever read about art criticism was in Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Bluebeard. Like a lot of Vonnegut’s ideas, it takes a complicated subject and reduces it to something very simple and true. I don’t have the book with me and a cursory trawl of the internet failed to bring up the quote I wanted, but the gist of it is this: the painter in the novel was asked how a person might learn how to recognise a great painting. And he replied that the surest way was to have seen thousands and thousands of other paintings.
I think this is true of pretty much everything. Once you have experienced the best and the worst of something, as well as enough of the in-between to get a sense of what is bland or typical, then you have a pretty good basis for understanding and evaluating the quality of a given example. I don’t think I’d be able to identify a really great bottle of wine, for instance, because I’m not a big wine drinker and I certainly haven’t tried enough really good wine to compare it with. But with visual arts, music and film I feel like I have a much better sense of the bell-curve of quality that exists in the medium, as well as the history and timeline of progression.
Read the post >>